Thursday, February 22, 2007

Xinjiang Briefing

Xinjiang Wind Farm
Photo Credit: Greenpeace.org

Der Spiegel:
"China is sending more troops to the mostly Muslim province of Xinjiang in the far west of the country. Concerns are rising in Beijing of ethnic unrest in the border region. Its plans for economic development there may be in trouble."
Main points:
  • China's strategy of dealing with rebellious provinces such as Tibet and Xinjiang is to try to change their ethnic composition by overwhelming them with settlers from heartland provinces. Add massive economic development, and China effectively colonizes the province and reduces the chances of revolt.
  • But this isn't working in Xinjiang. The ethnic Chinese settlers, like all colonists, have become the favored elite. Meanwhile, intense economic and racial discrimination has transformed the Uighurs into ghettoized and impoverished minority in their own homelands. This kind of strategy isn't going to turn Xinjiang into a docile province--it's going to transform it into a Chinese West Bank.
  • Despite intense Chinese repression, the Uighurs have already created potent physical and cultural temporary autonomous zones (TAZ).
  • The main Uighur separatist group, the East Turkistan Islamic Movement (ETIM), has a number of bases from which they conduct guerrilla attacks against the Chinese. They haven't made the jump to terrorism inside the Chinese heartland yet, but the Chinese are frightened enough of the possibility--they've banned liquids from airplane flights since 2003, and security is tightening around Beijing.
  • Uighur cultural identity is becoming a rallying point, with separatist activism taking place both within Xinjiang and on pro-Uighur websites.
Chechen Terrorists
Photo Credit: Mosnews.com

  • China is trying to appropriate an American "brand," the War on Terror, by portraying itself as engaged in a heroic struggle against Islamic Uighur terrorists with alleged links to Al-Qaeda. This is a tactic that both Russia and Ethiopia have used to great effect. Russia cast its punitive war against Chechen separatists as a struggle to eliminate Islamic terrorism, and anti-terrorist rhetoric also underscored Ethiopia's conflict with Somalia's then-governing Islamic Courts Union in Somalia.
  • This branding benefits China, Russia, and Ethiopia because it adds legitimacy to rather brutal regional counterinsurgencies with little connection to the War on Terror. Although the Chechens may have loose links to Al-Qaeda, the Chechen wars are essentially separatist conflicts that concern Russia's sphere in influence in the Caucus, not Al-Qaeda's war against America.
  • The Ethiopian invasion of Somalia had its roots in the two nations' historic geopolitical rivalry, not transnational terrorism. The Ethiopians saw a unified Somalia as a threat to their national interests and invaded to crush the ICU and install a friendly puppet regime, the UN-backed Transitional Federal Government. Although the Chinese have portrayed the Uighurs as Al-Qaeda affiliates, there is little evidence to suggest that the Uighurs are anything other than traditional nationalist guerrillas.
  • All of these conflicts have involved substantial human rights abuses. But in each case, Washington has allowed these authoritarian states to tap into our "brand." The State Department designed the ETIM as a terrorist group to appease the Chinese. Letting others appropriate our "brand" for their own ends only associates us with their unsavory actions. With our "brand" very unpopular as it is, we should zealously guard it from those seeking to exploit it.
Shanghai Skyline
Photo Credit: GVSU.edu

  • Ironically, China's labeling of Uighur guerrilla actions as "terrorism" may prove to be a self-fulfilling prophecy. As Chinese policies continue to alienate the Uighurs, militant Islam will grow attractive to them. And if China is intent on aligning itself as a part of the American-led War on Terror, it is not inconceivable that it, like other American allies, will become a target for terrorists. If Al-Qaeda seeks to strike inside China, it already has an aggrieved population of Muslims ready to assist it.

16 comments:

Phil said...

There is a lot of underreported terrorism in China, including apartment bombings that have killed hundreds (like the Moscow ones that started the 2nd Chechen war).

The suspects who were arrested were probably fake. Mentally ill, disabled, lone-wolf, etc. Something doesn't add up. One of the few references on the web is on a Falun Gong site which refers to the apartment, theatre and mall bombings in one city as a divine punishment for the persecution of their adherents.

Toby - Northern Light Blog said...

Washington has allowed these authoritarian states to tap into our "brand." The State Department designed the ETIM as a terrorist group to appease the Chinese. Letting others appropriate our "brand" for their own ends only associates us with their unsavory actions. With our "brand" very unpopular as it is, we should zealously guard it from those seeking to exploit it.

I suspect it's too late. Now that motif of the "GWOT" is an chains, orange boiler suits and blacked out googles, some local repression and human rights abuses in part of China that 95% of the rest of world is completely unaware of, isn't going to do much to devalue the brand. To stretch the analogy painfully, once we all knew that Nike used Vietnamese kids in sweatshops to make our trainers, the fact the their newest season of jogging shoes got a bad review in "Jogger's monthly" didn't lower our opinion on them that much more. Nike had to consider the entire way it did business, becoming a leader in corporate responsibility to get us touchy-feely-socially-aware- but-still-tragically-hip-and-well-dressed customers back. Actually I quite like this analogy so I'm going to run with it... Of course Nike always had a brand-loyal core of customers who didn't really give a shite either way that their shoes were made by Vietnamese kids; these are the Little Green Footballs/Jihad Watch readers of the sneaker-buying public: "Uighurs? What religion are they? Oh Muslims! Well of course they are terrorists. Nuke 'em all, I say." They are generally happy to support anyone who will oppress anyone else who say "Allahu Akhbar", even if they are a bit suspicious of the Chinese normally otherwise.

The GWOT was good branding for US domestic audiences post-9/11 who were reeling from the shock, but has generally been a disaster everywhere else. It militarizes a struggle that was always going to be more about policing, intelligence cooperation, and will be ameliorated, if not actually stopped, by social justice primarily and JDAMs only as an absolutely last resort.

Anonymous said...

There was a Uighur presence in Afganistan when we went in there in '02. Not sure about the details though.

A.E. said...

Toby, I was talking about Chechnya and Somalia as well. But yes, the greatest damage to the already unpopular "brand" of GWOT has been America's own foolish actions.

That being, sad, whatever we can do to avoid digging ourselves a deeper hole is a good thing.

A.E. said...

Phil,

If you have information on that, please direct it my way. I was unaware of the apartment bombings, and if they've been going on, it would make great material for another theory post about the terrorism cycle.

J. Otto Pohl said...

Good post on East Turkestan. But, I suspect that given the much larger Han population that eventually they will be able to reduce the Uighers to a small minority in their homeland. In that sense it is more like parts of the US, Canada or Australia in the 19th century than the West Bank. The Israelis do not have the man power to reduce the Palestinians to a small minority of the West Bank through settlement. The Chinese do have the manpower to do this to the Uighers.

A.E. said...

Interesting perspective. They pursued a similar strategy in Tibet.

Phil said...

Four simultaneous bombs killed at least 108 in Shijiazhuang on March 16th, 2001. Residents suggested that far more were probably killed as 4 apartment buildings were destroyed. The arrested suspect was deaf, and no evidence was given other than his confession.

A.E. said...

That's really interesting.

China has really gone all-out to keep this sort of thing under wraps, eh?

Anonymous said...

China is well on its way to ethnically cleansing the indegenous people of Tibet and Xinjiang and nobody gives a damn. Except the writer of this post, ofcourse.

If only those wretched people would borrow a page form the Palestinian people, maybe then the world would take notice.

Anonymous said...

I am an Indian immigrant student at an elite New York University.
My first week at School, I was confronted by a massive anti-Israel demonstration, which was manned by students and teachers of all stripe.

One of the organisers of the - "disinvest from Israel day" - was an Indian academic, whohappened to be from the Himachal Pradesh, a state in Northern India, where the majority of Tibetan refugees, including the Dalai Lama reside.
When I asked the said academic, when are you going to demonstrate against the Chinese occupation of Tibet?
Suffice to say,two years later, I have yet to receive an answer......

p.s. sorry fot he long winded comment. hope you guys get

Anonymous said...

....my point

Phil (Pacific Empire) said...

More info on Chinese terrorist attacks, particularly in Shijazhuang:
World Socialist Web Site analysis of apartment bombings
Commentary: Social unrest in China (with list of recent attacks)
BombSecurity.com on some other unexplained Shijazhuang blasts
BBC: Suicide bomb in China tourist spot
And the Falun Gong link:
"The areas where the authorities have been brutally persecuting Dafa
practitioners are also where disasters are frequently happening. Please note the
following reports of brutality in these cities and provinces..."
The quote follows a list of terror bombings (including some not mentioned in the above links) and follows with descriptions of Falun Gong persecution in the same areas, especially in Shijazhuang, where it seems quite popular.  I suppose it is pretty tenuous to suggest Falun Gong involvement, though.

Eddie said...

What's most fascinating is that after the Olympics China could probably ethnically cleanse the Uighurs and get away with it. The West was quite passive in the face of horrific retribution against the Chechen people by the Russians, why should we expect anything less with the Chinese?

subadei said...

How demonstrable is this of the old Com. Guard losing it's grip in light of both an increasingly free market and global connectivity?

I've taken the tack of "as China westernizes will they also suffer a national fracture effect along ethnic lines" before. Most responses to this were in line with a Han resistance in light of economic disparity. Reading this (and Phils excellent post at PE) I have to wonder if China will face both nightmare scenarios at the same time.

shalomplaza said...

I traveled to Xinjiang last year, and its clear that people are restless. There have been many unreported instances of terrorism there and discontent is more widespread than it would seem.

Several Uighurs made a point of telling me how much they despise the Chinese government. I made a few blog posts about XJ separatism too.